geode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nabarun Nag <n...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow
Date Wed, 09 Aug 2017 20:57:18 GMT
+1

will this allow us to choose reviewers while creating PRs on github now?

Regards
Nabarun

On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 1:19 PM Udo Kohlmeyer <ukohlmeyer@pivotal.io> wrote:

> +1
>
>
> On 8/9/17 12:56, Anthony Baker wrote:
> > +1
> >
> >> On Aug 8, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Mark Bretl <asf.mbretl@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 for Gitbox
> >>
> >> I have been watching threads on INFRA list and been waiting to see when
> a
> >> good time would be to introduce the idea to the community. The Gitbox
> >> project has been going since the end of 2016 and looks as though it
> might
> >> be ready now as INFRA has begun moving some of their repositories to
> >> GitHub. We still need to 'apply' by submitting a ticket to INFRA and
> wait
> >> for approval, INFRA could still deny the move.
> >>
> >> Advantages:
> >> - GitHub PRs are fully functional (something which stopped us earlier)
> >> - Provides ability to align committer and non-committer workflows
> >> - Removing mirror from Git at Apache to GitHub and thus removing delay
> in
> >> sync
> >>
> >> Disadvantages:
> >> - Permission mapping is configured on id.apache.org (need to set
> GitHub ID)
> >>
> >> I can't think of many disadvantages to moving to GitBox.
> >>
> >> --Mark
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Dan Smith <dsmith@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm in favor of switching to gitbox. We're already getting pretty much
> all
> >>> contributions from non-committers coming in as pull requests so we
> might as
> >>> well make it easier for us to manage things in github.
> >>>
> >>> -Dan
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Kirk Lund <klund@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> One thing that's given me trouble is that the mirroring of ASF git
> (for
> >>>> Apache Geode) to github can have a lengthy delay. In other words,
> after I
> >>>> commit to ASF git, it's not uncommon for my commit to not show up in
> the
> >>>> GitHub mirror right away and I've seen this delay take an hour.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <
> roman@shaposhnik.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF
> >>>>> has been enabling full GitHub workflow (with being
> >>>>> able to click Merge this PR button, etc.) for quite
> >>>>> some time.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This basically allows a project to have GH as a R/W
> >>>>> repo as opposed to R/O mirror of what we all currnently
> >>>>> have: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Personally I'm not sure I like GH workflow all that much,
> >>>>> but if there's interest -- you can opt-in into Gitbox. Once
> >>>>> you do -- your source of truth moves to GH. You can't
> >>>>> have it both ways with git-wip-us.apache.org and Gitbox.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Roman.
> >>>>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message