geode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dan Smith <dsm...@pivotal.io>
Subject Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow
Date Tue, 22 Aug 2017 18:07:47 GMT
+1 - Let's do it!

-Dan

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Dave Barnes <dbarnes@pivotal.io> wrote:

> +1
> I'm interested to see how it works for geode-site, which has a sorta quirky
> build/branch structure.
>
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Jared Stewart <jstewart@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 for moving the other repos to Gitbox
> >
> > On Aug 22, 2017 10:43 AM, "Anthony Baker" <abaker@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Aug 7, 2017, at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF
> > > has been enabling full GitHub workflow (with being
> > > able to click Merge this PR button, etc.) for quite
> > > some time.
> > >
> > > This basically allows a project to have GH as a R/W
> > > repo as opposed to R/O mirror of what we all currnently
> > > have: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf
> > >
> > > Personally I'm not sure I like GH workflow all that much,
> > > but if there's interest -- you can opt-in into Gitbox. Once
> > > you do -- your source of truth moves to GH. You can't
> > > have it both ways with git-wip-us.apache.org and Gitbox.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Roman.
> >
> > Now that we’ve got some experience with gitbox on geode-native, are we
> > ready to convert the other repos?
> >
> > - geode
> > - geode-site
> > - geode-examples
> >
> > I think we should.
> >
> > Anthony
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message