geode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ernest Burghardt <eburgha...@pivotal.io>
Subject Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow
Date Fri, 11 Aug 2017 16:22:55 GMT
+1

On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Nabarun Nag <nnag@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> will this allow us to choose reviewers while creating PRs on github now?
>
> Regards
> Nabarun
>
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 1:19 PM Udo Kohlmeyer <ukohlmeyer@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On 8/9/17 12:56, Anthony Baker wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > >> On Aug 8, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Mark Bretl <asf.mbretl@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> +1 for Gitbox
> > >>
> > >> I have been watching threads on INFRA list and been waiting to see
> when
> > a
> > >> good time would be to introduce the idea to the community. The Gitbox
> > >> project has been going since the end of 2016 and looks as though it
> > might
> > >> be ready now as INFRA has begun moving some of their repositories to
> > >> GitHub. We still need to 'apply' by submitting a ticket to INFRA and
> > wait
> > >> for approval, INFRA could still deny the move.
> > >>
> > >> Advantages:
> > >> - GitHub PRs are fully functional (something which stopped us earlier)
> > >> - Provides ability to align committer and non-committer workflows
> > >> - Removing mirror from Git at Apache to GitHub and thus removing delay
> > in
> > >> sync
> > >>
> > >> Disadvantages:
> > >> - Permission mapping is configured on id.apache.org (need to set
> > GitHub ID)
> > >>
> > >> I can't think of many disadvantages to moving to GitBox.
> > >>
> > >> --Mark
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Dan Smith <dsmith@pivotal.io> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I'm in favor of switching to gitbox. We're already getting pretty
> much
> > all
> > >>> contributions from non-committers coming in as pull requests so we
> > might as
> > >>> well make it easier for us to manage things in github.
> > >>>
> > >>> -Dan
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Kirk Lund <klund@apache.org>
wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> One thing that's given me trouble is that the mirroring of ASF
git
> > (for
> > >>>> Apache Geode) to github can have a lengthy delay. In other words,
> > after I
> > >>>> commit to ASF git, it's not uncommon for my commit to not show
up in
> > the
> > >>>> GitHub mirror right away and I've seen this delay take an hour.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <
> > roman@shaposhnik.org>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hi!
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF
> > >>>>> has been enabling full GitHub workflow (with being
> > >>>>> able to click Merge this PR button, etc.) for quite
> > >>>>> some time.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This basically allows a project to have GH as a R/W
> > >>>>> repo as opposed to R/O mirror of what we all currnently
> > >>>>> have: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Personally I'm not sure I like GH workflow all that much,
> > >>>>> but if there's interest -- you can opt-in into Gitbox. Once
> > >>>>> you do -- your source of truth moves to GH. You can't
> > >>>>> have it both ways with git-wip-us.apache.org and Gitbox.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>> Roman.
> > >>>>>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message