geode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ken Howe <kh...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Gitbox enables the full GitHub workflow
Date Tue, 22 Aug 2017 18:27:58 GMT
+1 Yes, let’s make the move

> On Aug 22, 2017, at 11:21 AM, Nabarun Nag <nnag@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:15 AM Kirk Lund <klund@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> +1 to move all our repos to gitbox
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Jacob Barrett <jbarrett@pivotal.io>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>>> On Aug 22, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Jared Stewart <jstewart@pivotal.io>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> +1 for moving the other repos to Gitbox
>>>> 
>>>> On Aug 22, 2017 10:43 AM, "Anthony Baker" <abaker@pivotal.io> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Aug 7, 2017, at 6:09 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>> 
>>>>> it has just come to my attention that Gitbox at ASF
>>>>> has been enabling full GitHub workflow (with being
>>>>> able to click Merge this PR button, etc.) for quite
>>>>> some time.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This basically allows a project to have GH as a R/W
>>>>> repo as opposed to R/O mirror of what we all currnently
>>>>> have: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf
>>>>> 
>>>>> Personally I'm not sure I like GH workflow all that much,
>>>>> but if there's interest -- you can opt-in into Gitbox. Once
>>>>> you do -- your source of truth moves to GH. You can't
>>>>> have it both ways with git-wip-us.apache.org and Gitbox.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Roman.
>>>> 
>>>> Now that we’ve got some experience with gitbox on geode-native, are we
>>>> ready to convert the other repos?
>>>> 
>>>> - geode
>>>> - geode-site
>>>> - geode-examples
>>>> 
>>>> I think we should.
>>>> 
>>>> Anthony
>>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message