geode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ernest Burghardt <eburgha...@pivotal.io>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Using Pull Requests over Review Board
Date Tue, 20 Jun 2017 19:43:01 GMT
+1 for PRs in Github - one place, simple

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Kenneth Howe <khowe@pivotal.io> wrote:

> -1 per my comments on the [DISCUSS] thread
>
> > On Jun 11, 2017, at 9:51 AM, Jacob Barrett <jbarrett@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >
> > After a few days of discussion [1] this thread has quieted down so I
> would
> > like to take it to a vote. The proposal is to modify the workflow of
> > committers to match that of non-committers such that committers shall:
> >
> > * Perform all work in progress on branches in their personal forks on
> > GitHub rather than directly on the ASF Geode repositories.
> >
> > * Submit GitHub pull requests, following all current rules for pull
> > requests, for changes that would require peer review before committing to
> > the production branches.
> >
> > * Register their GitHub accounts with the ASF so that committers can be
> > identified in the GitHub mirror repositories.
> >
> >
> > Please cast your vote.
> >
> > [   ] +1  Approve
> > [   ] +0  No opinion
> > [   ] -1  Disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> >
> > [1] [DISCUSS] Using Pull Requests over Review Board
> > <http://geode.markmail.org/message/row5hgz5zw2ooadl?q=
> list:org%2Eapache%2Egeode%2Edev+discuss+pull>
> >
> > -Jake
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message