geode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (GEODE-3002) Improve doc of (Lucene) __REGION_VALUE_FIELD
Date Tue, 30 May 2017 21:17:04 GMT


ASF GitHub Bot commented on GEODE-3002:

Github user joeymcallister commented on a diff in the pull request:
    --- Diff: geode-docs/tools_modules/gfsh/command-pages/ ---
    @@ -62,12 +62,12 @@ search lucene --name=value --region=value --queryStrings=value --defaultField=va
     <td><span class="keyword parmname" style="whitespace:nowrap;">&#8209;&#8208;queryStrings</span></td>
    -<td><em>Required</em>. Query string to search the lucene index.</td>
    +<td><em>Required</em>. Query string to search the lucene index. Use
<code>__REGION_VALUE_FIELD</code> as the field name within the query string when
the field is a primitive value.</td>
    --- End diff --
    Is there a contextual reason to use "lucene index" here, rather than "Lucene" index with
a capital L?

> Improve doc of (Lucene) __REGION_VALUE_FIELD
> --------------------------------------------
>                 Key: GEODE-3002
>                 URL:
>             Project: Geode
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: docs
>            Reporter: Karen Smoler Miller
>            Assignee: Karen Smoler Miller
>            Priority: Minor
> The original description of {{__REGION_VALUE_FIELD}} is not quite right. In addition,
there is an example gfsh command using this value that is wrong.  It is in the {{gfsh create
lucene index}} command reference page.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message