Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geode.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geode.apache.org
From: Michael William Dodge <mdodge@pivotal.io>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="Apple-Mail=_72E7AD45-2B0A-4F79-811E-651ED535C5C2"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: Voting Process
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 14:49:26 -0800
References: <CA+OE_e1+iZ3yc_M4wcgY_vc=MkktkeT87QBbsWrRGgc2jijg5A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CDC4AA28-041C-4DD0-9938-548B45310568@pivotal.io>
To: dev@geode.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <CDC4AA28-041C-4DD0-9938-548B45310568@pivotal.io>
Message-Id: <DFCDB576-30A7-4ABB-9BEA-23C654DBABBD@pivotal.io>
archived-at: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 22:49:38 -0000

--Apple-Mail=_72E7AD45-2B0A-4F79-811E-651ED535C5C2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii

+0.9 :)

> On 15 Feb, 2017, at 14:48, Anthony Baker <abaker@pivotal.io> wrote:
>=20
>>=20
>> On Feb 15, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Mark Bretl <mbretl@apache.org> wrote:
>>=20
>> Hi,
>>=20
>> Now that we are a top-level project, we need to make sure votes are =
counted
>> correctly, according to the Apache Voting Process [1]. For this past
>> release vote, we only had PMC votes, however, that could change in =
the
>> future as we would like to encourage community feedback. In the =
future, i
>> think we should clarify binding vs non-binding votes on the vote =
result
>> thread.
>>=20
>> Best regards,
>>=20
>> --Mark
>>=20
>> [1] http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>=20
> +1
>=20
> :-)


--Apple-Mail=_72E7AD45-2B0A-4F79-811E-651ED535C5C2--