geode-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Swapnil Bawaskar <>
Subject Re: GeodeRedisAdapter improvments/feedback
Date Thu, 16 Feb 2017 01:09:26 GMT
I think we as a community need to determine what value do we want to add
with the Redis adapter. Redis already does a great job storing small data
structures in memory and sharding them. We do a great job of making sure
that these data structures are horizontally scalable; why would we want to
replicate what another open source project is already implementing?

Having said that, I would like to see a configuration property that lets
the user chose between a single server vs a distributed collection.

> I think we could have the following options:
>  1. have a property that could be set to use either single server
>     collections over use the current distributed collection
>  2. have first class collection implementations that are distributed by
>     nature, as using key:value as the hammer for all does not make sense

I don't think these options are mutually exclusive. We should make lists
and SortedSets first class data structures in Geode alongside regions.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message