gearpump-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kam Kasravi <kamkasr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Gearpump-0.8.2-incubating [RC0]
Date Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:13:30 GMT
Thanks - will do

On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Manu Zhang <owenzhang1990@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think we should go the kafka way which is consistent with the naming of
> gearpump libraries and the archive generated by "sbt packArchive"
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:26 PM Kam Kasravi <kamkasravi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Ah - thanks Manu - yes i was looking at the nested folders. That is
> > incorrect and should be fixed. For excluding the scala version in the tar
> > file 'gearpump-0.8.2-incubating-bin.tgz' - I followed the pattern
> similar
> > to spark which doesn't do this. Although I'm noting that flink does and
> > kafka does. Since the latter two are more scala based projects I think I
> > should probably include scala in the tar names for both source and bin
> tar
> > files. For 0.8.1 source release we did not include scala version in the
> > name (which was probably a mistake).
> >
> > To summarize, we should rerelease a RC1 (I can cancel the VOTE) with no
> > nested gearpump-2.11-0.8.2 in the gearpump-0.8.2-incubating-bin.tgz
> binary
> > release and both the source and binary releases should include the scala
> > version in their names. Manu - since kafka and flink include the scala
> > version in different ways (see
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/kafka/0.10.1.0/ and
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/flink-1.1.3/) which
> > convention do you think we should use?
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Manu Zhang <owenzhang1990@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Kam.
> > >
> > > I find that the scala version is omitted from the tar file. Inside the
> > tar
> > > file, there is another folder "gearpump-2.11-0.8.2" which contains the
> > > actual binaries.  Is this the standard way ?
> > >
> > > Manu
> > >
> > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 12:38 PM Kam Kasravi <kamkasravi@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Gearpump Community
> > > >
> > > > This is a call for a discussion releasing Apache Gearpump
> > > > 0.8.2-incubating, release candidate 0. This is the first release
> > > candidate.
> > > >
> > > > The source and binary tarballs, including signatures, digests, etc.
> can
> > > be
> > > > found
> > > > at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump/0.
> > > 8.2-incubating/RC0/
> > > >
> > > > The tag to be voted upon
> > > > is
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > > gearpump.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/0.8.2-RC0
> > > >
> > > > The release hash
> > > > is
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > > gearpump.git;a=tree;h=21fcd2338b248be4ede0d42f30d65b872b2a31d1
> > > >
> > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following
> > > > key:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > The KEYS file is available
> > > > here:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/gearpump/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > For information about the contents of this release
> > > > see:
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > > gearpump.git;a=blob;f=CHANGELOG.md;h=314d5f0619da0c4170dea6fc6881e5
> > > c09e5153cb;hb=refs/tags/0.8.2-RC0
> > > >
> > > > This vote will be open for 96 hours (Tues, November 15, 2016 at
> 8:30PM
> > > > PST).
> > > >
> > > > Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary
> items
> > > > including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, run the
> > > > binary artifacts in the binary release and test.
> > > > Please vote:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as gearpump-0.8.2
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Kam
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message