gearpump-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kam Kasravi <kamkasr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: prepping for staging and voting on candidate release
Date Sat, 18 Jun 2016 20:00:58 GMT
Thanks Andy. I'm most of the way through the release steps. I'll update on Monday. 

    On Friday, June 17, 2016 5:53 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:
 

 I should have some free time next week to help out. Please let me know
how/if I can be of assistance.


On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Kam Kasravi <kamkasravi@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Andy, Karol
>
> The release process also suggests Rat - http://creadur.apache.org/rat/ for
> auditing / verifying licenses.
> Karol your report has a lot of unrecognized dependencies that are apache
> based (eg zookeeper).
> I'll try running the sbt license report and rat and see what they generate.
>
> Kam
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Karol Brejna <karolbrejna@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > In our project I used maven licence plugin. I see there is something
> > similar for sbt: https://github.com/sbt/sbt-license-report
> >
> > I never used it but it probably do fine for us.
> >
> > I opened a Jira ticket (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEARPUMP-157)
> > to validate/update
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-gearpump/blob/master/LICENSE
> >
> > Regards,
> > Karol
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > wt., 14.06.2016 o 02:42 użytkownik Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> > napisał:
> >
> >> Sorry for the hold up Kam.
> >>
> >> You will want to look at http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
> >>
> >> We will need especially close attention to the contents of the LICENSE
> and
> >> NOTICE files when making the first release. That FAQ talks about them
> >> starting here http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#license . If you
> are
> >> only releasing a source package it is pretty straightforward. The signed
> >> source package is mandatory anyway. If you want to also release binary
> >> convenience packages with bundled dependencies, the LICENSE and NOTICE
> >> files for the binary packages must enumerate all non-ASF licenses of the
> >> bundled dependencies. Over on HBase we ended up automating the
> generation
> >> of LICENSE and NOTICE files using quite a bit of Maven hackery. Perhaps
> >> you'll want to start with only making a source package.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Kam Kasravi <kamkasravi@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > The release process I've been looking at is here -
> >> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html and the maven
> >> > publishing link within this document.
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Kam Kasravi <kamkasravi@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi Andy
> >> >>
> >> >> I would like to begin staging for a candidate release and call for
a
> >> vote.
> >> >> You had mentioned there were some notes/caveats on the release
> process
> >> >> you could provide?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks
> >> >> Kam
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >>    - Andy
> >>
> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> >> (via Tom White)
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Best regards,

  - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

  
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message