freemarker-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel Dekany (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Assigned] (FREEMARKER-40) ClassIntrospector should detect public methods in non-public classes
Date Tue, 15 Nov 2016 19:36:58 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FREEMARKER-40?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Daniel Dekany reassigned FREEMARKER-40:
---------------------------------------

    Assignee: Daniel Dekany

> ClassIntrospector should detect public methods in non-public classes
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FREEMARKER-40
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FREEMARKER-40
>             Project: Apache Freemarker
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: engine
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.25-incubating
>            Reporter: Jochen Wiedmann
>            Assignee: Daniel Dekany
>            Priority: Minor
>
> In ClassIntrospector.discoverAccessibleMethods, the assumption is made, that only public
classes can have accessible methods. This is plainly wrong: For example, a private object
might be implementing an interface.
> Freemarker should detect public gettters, and treat them as accessible. At the very least,
it should inform the user about the problem. A message like
>   "Key <propertyName> was not found on an instance of ..."
> should be replaced by
>   "Key <propertyName> was not found on an instance of ..."
>   "A possible reason is,that the class must be public."
> Thanks,
> Jochen



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message