Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 94753 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2005 17:01:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 2005 17:01:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 58856 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2005 17:00:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-user-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 58772 invoked by uid 500); 17 Nov 2005 17:00:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: user@forrest.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list user@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 58690 invoked by uid 99); 17 Nov 2005 17:00:57 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:00:57 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [212.23.3.142] (HELO rutherford.zen.co.uk) (212.23.3.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:02:30 -0800 Received: from [82.69.78.226] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by rutherford.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Ecn7i-00046j-ON for user@forrest.apache.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 17:00:34 +0000 Message-ID: <437CB728.6080603@apache.org> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 17:00:24 +0000 From: Ross Gardler User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: user@forrest.apache.org Subject: Re: Recommended Forrest/Lenya CMS Strategies? References: <972AE0AAB416644FB6B70E86F502D24456D2DC@northexch01.kollnet.com> <1132161335.8255.64.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1132161335.8255.64.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-Rutherford-IP: [82.69.78.226] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Thorsten Scherler wrote: >>I plan to use Forrest only to create new pubs or port existing pubs. >>Once complete, they will live in the Lenya CMS and never return to >>Forrest. >> >> >> >>>There are a couple of issues to solve to have a out-of-the-box support >> >>for lenya2forrest and vice versa. One major thing is site.xml (forrest) >>vs sitetree.xml (lenya) and the way lenya stores documents (special >>folder hierarchy). >> >>This requires some thinking on my part as I assumed that going from >>Forrest to Lenya is easily accomplished. Should I simply port direct to >>Lenya and leave Forrest out of the process? > > > Actually if you really only want to use forrest to prepare the import I > strongly recommend to use lenya directly. I do not see any benefit from > porting first to forrest. Sadly we do not yet have accomplished an easy > integration process from forrest2lenya which would justify this step. > > Later on you can use the lenya-plugin of the whiteboard to get the > content and render it with forrest, because that is the part that lenya > should/could use from forrest. I would agree with Thorsten here. There is not really anything to be gained in using Forrest to leverage your stuff into Lenya. When I read your original mail I thought you were wanting to use Forrest to publish the documents and use Lenya to edit them. This is the first goal of the Forrest-Lenya plugin we have hinted at for a long time now (but nobody has implemented). If you want to use Lenya to both edit *and* publish then you are better off going straight into Lenya. Ross