Mailing-List: contact user-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@forrest.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of brian.dube@gmail.com designates
 72.14.204.192 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=uZsVIGMQsic8djhKLQfvZU/ofYKZePOKjtGDeQgKzkPFH/2jwlHfYBfzddfVuZ5zLAPIpVlSvF8UxwDK2OKEihOB4yGTGbiYwrVL7jktvSYKjvd2OPzhl/7R463lWeo40B/E0pGjIsl1lAms53Yk79C4QNT8zgKs3b080rl+m3A=
Message-ID: <2a18206d0510161440o1d8b0b85ib069a0633a318d58@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 16:40:35 -0500
From: Brian M Dube <brian.dube@gmail.com>
To: user@forrest.apache.org
Subject: Re: Custom HTML source
In-Reply-To: <2a18206d0510152215g7b1b1f2evc5da1740d8eda01f@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <2a18206d0510152215g7b1b1f2evc5da1740d8eda01f@mail.gmail.com>

On 10/16/05, Brian M Dube <brian.dube@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Following the example in the documentation, I've added a custom
> pipeline to support rendering existing HTML sources within the local
> Forrest installation. The pattern match works and the HTML is skinned.
> The problem is that I can't get the transformation to process the
> intermediate file. Here is the relevant pipeline:
>
>   <map:pipeline>
>     <map:match pattern=3D"/old/*.xml">
>       <map:generate src=3D"{project:content.xdocs}{uri}.html" type=3D"htm=
l"/>
>       <map:transform src=3D"{project:resources.stylesheets}/fixoldhtml.xs=
l"/>
>       <map:transform src=3D"{forrest:stylesheets}/html2document.xsl"/>
>       <map:transform type=3D"idgen"/>
>       <map:serialize type=3D"xml-document"/>
>     </map:match>
>   </map:pipeline>
>
> fixoldhtml.xsl is the stylesheet I made to remove the navigational
> markup from the old site, as the documentation describes. Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Brian

I think the problem is the match pattern after all. I get the same
results when I delete the project sitemap. I'll continue modifying the
pattern to see what I get.

Brian