Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22324 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2005 14:50:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Jan 2005 14:50:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 99925 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2005 14:50:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-user-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 99901 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2005 14:50:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: user@forrest.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 99886 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jan 2005 14:50:33 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (HELO smtpout.mac.com) (17.250.248.85) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 06:50:30 -0800 Received: from mac.com (smtpin07-en2 [10.13.10.152]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id j0REoNNW015624 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 06:50:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [80.186.218.158] (a80-186-218-158.elisa-laajakaista.fi [80.186.218.158]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin07/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id j0REoL03028384 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 06:50:22 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <437be9d43296f48213192e9a41864388@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: user@forrest.apache.org From: Sjur Moshagen Subject: Does a status.dtd make sense? Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:50:08 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hello, I would like to have editing support for the status.xml file found at the root of a standard Forrest seed. But I could find no status.dtd or similar. So I made my own status.dtd, which is basically a wrapper around the exising changes.dtd and todo.dtd (based on v1.2 of those files). Would there be any interest in such a DTD? Should I open a new bug to attach the files to? Or is there a specific reason why there is no such dtd? Regards, Sjur