Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77944 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2004 20:01:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Dec 2004 20:01:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 27382 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2004 20:01:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-user-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 27302 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2004 20:01:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: user@forrest.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 27247 invoked by uid 99); 13 Dec 2004 20:01:35 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from pythagoras.zen.co.uk (HELO pythagoras.zen.co.uk) (212.23.3.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:01:31 -0800 Received: from [82.69.78.226] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by pythagoras.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CdrTV-00011R-8E for user@forrest.apache.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:46:57 +0000 Message-ID: <41BDAB5F.8050601@apache.org> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:46:55 +0000 From: Ross Gardler User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: user@forrest.apache.org Subject: Re: OOo tables References: <41B9D5CC.3050509@uidesign.de> <41BA063B.3060306@apache.org> <41BD690B.2090304@uidesign.de> <001301c4e101$296d1c90$9701a8c0@dsp.local> In-Reply-To: <001301c4e101$296d1c90$9701a8c0@dsp.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-Pythagoras-IP: [82.69.78.226] X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Charles Palmer wrote: > This is probably better addressed to the devt list, but I'm not signed up > there. > > I did some work improving OOo tables back in September > (http://issues.cocoondev.org//browse/FOR-262) - in particular tables with > cells that are merged. I've been away for a while and have returned, and > note that this work hasn't been incorporated. Could I commend it to you as > an improvement? (Those with better skills than me can no doubt do much > better...) According to the issue tracker this patch was applied on 10 Sep. and the issue was closed. However, I just checked the source in the plugin and indeed, the code does not appear to be present. I've reopened the issue and will adress it soon. Thanks for highlighting this. Ross