Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 62552 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2004 17:22:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Dec 2004 17:22:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 81079 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2004 17:22:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-user-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 81047 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2004 17:22:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: user@forrest.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 81036 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2004 17:22:14 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from heisenberg.zen.co.uk (HELO heisenberg.zen.co.uk) (212.23.3.141) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 09:22:12 -0800 Received: from [82.69.78.226] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by heisenberg.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Cc5Vy-00071F-7J for user@forrest.apache.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 17:22:10 +0000 Message-ID: <41B73841.60502@apache.org> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 17:22:09 +0000 From: Ross Gardler User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: user@forrest.apache.org Subject: Re: Question: how to enable document section numbering? References: <1AB048BB58C35849AD36CDE65F16C110E0FB7B@idaexc01.emea.cpqcorp.net> <012c01c4dd49$1df8eb20$9701a8c0@dsp.local> In-Reply-To: <012c01c4dd49$1df8eb20$9701a8c0@dsp.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-Heisenberg-IP: [82.69.78.226] X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Charles Palmer wrote: > Looks good. > > Now I'm trying my luck here: > > Can we get letters in the TOC numbering? My manuals have appendices, and > appendix section numbers are of the form A.1.1, B.3.2 etc. In note the > "format="1.1.1.1.1.1"" attribute, which invites the question: would > "format="A.1.1.1.1.1.1" do the job? http://www.w3schools.com/xsl/el_number.asp Ross