Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27522 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2004 18:18:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Aug 2004 18:18:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 61319 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2004 17:46:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-user-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 61288 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2004 17:46:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: user@forrest.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 61148 invoked by uid 99); 4 Aug 2004 17:46:47 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [65.77.211.93] (HELO indexgeo.net) (65.77.211.93) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Aug 2004 10:46:47 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (dsl-109.227.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.227.109]) (authenticated bits=0) by www2.kc.aoindustries.com (8.12.9-20030917/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i74Hkg3I018023 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:46:44 -0500 Subject: Re: apply changes in XSLs after revision update (was: How to create a patch for forrest) From: David Crossley To: forrest In-Reply-To: <4110DA9D.7050701@uidesign.de> References: <4110DA9D.7050701@uidesign.de> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1091641128.13878.27178.camel@ighp> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 05 Aug 2004 03:46:29 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Johannes Schaefer wrote: > We are using the forrest development version > and getting it via svn. To stay up-to-date > we get a new copy now and then. Good. However you should do that as often as possible. > After that > we copy our "documentation" tree into the > forrest-dir for the new revision. So far so > good. No, not good. I do not understand what you are doing. Why are you copying stuff into the Forrest source tree? If you are building your own documentation then it should be completely outside of Forrest, e.g. over in /home/you/my-docs/ do a 'forrest seed' and add your new documentation in there. > We changed some forrest-core styleguides to > our needs (and tastes). Now, after each > update we have to apply these changes to the > new revision. Why can't you do it how i described in the last thread? When you do 'svn update', if there were any source changes to the files that you have modified, then those changes will get safely merged with yours. If there are conflicts because someone changed the exact same portion of the file that you changed, then you will be warned and you will need to fix them. -- David Crossley