forrest-svn mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
Subject svn commit: r413020 - /forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060609-log.txt
Date Fri, 09 Jun 2006 11:40:05 GMT
Author: crossley
Date: Fri Jun  9 04:40:04 2006
New Revision: 413020



Modified: forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060609-log.txt
--- forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060609-log.txt (original)
+++ forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060609-log.txt Fri Jun  9 04:40:04 2006
@@ -90,3 +90,25 @@
 [21:10] Ross: Agreed, the code allready used the Muenchian method
 [21:11] Ross: I'll try and remember what I was doing before Zeph started demanding (he's
in bed now)
 [21:13] xley: do you still have the *.rej or whatever file leftover from your svn conflicts?
+[21:20] Ross: Nope, I stupidly deleted all changed-to-* files and updated
+[21:20] Ross: I have an idea of what I was doing, I'm just suprised i kind of worked, because
prior to THorstens change it did not change anything
+[21:20] Ross: So if I can just find how the two were intereacting...
+[21:27] Ross: (nb the "conflicts" were not svn conflicts, that merged oK, they were conflicts
in the sense of my edits conflicting with Thorstens solution)
+[21:27] xley: ah.
+[21:31] » _Gav_ joined the chat room.
+[21:32] xley: do we really want this page to contain all changes for all releases. I mean
i wonder if it would work better as separate pages: changes_0.7.html and changes_0.8-dev.html
instead. Perhaps then the xsl:key could be based on the $versionNumber passed in.
+[21:32] xley: Hi Gav
+[21:32] _Gav_: Hi David, Hi All
+[21:34] xley: Ross: would that help to limit the key() to just the current contributors?
+[21:34] Ross: THi gav
+[21:35] Ross: David:
+[21:35] Ross: that functionality is already in there
+[21:35] xley: yes but ...
+[21:35] Ross:​cs/plugins_0_80/org.apache.forrest​.plugin.input.projectInfo/changes_​0.1.html
+[21:36] xley: i wondered if is because of requesting changes.html i.e. everything (all releases
together) that causes this FOR-839 problem
+[21:36] Ross: Yes, it is..
+[21:36] xley: yes that functionality is great. Thanks.
+[21:37] xley: lemme test
+[21:37] Ross: for FOR-839 we need to "simply" select on release/@version and release/action/@dev,
currently we do not.
+[21:38] Ross: Your suggestion is certainly a good workaround, and I'm not looking at the
actual problem right now (distracted by a funding application0
+[21:38] xley: changes_0.7.html does not contain Sjur

View raw message