Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-svn-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46912 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2006 11:20:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2006 11:20:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 39248 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2006 11:20:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-svn-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 39178 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2006 11:20:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact svn-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: "Forrest Developers List" List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list svn@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 39164 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2006 11:20:29 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 03:20:29 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [209.237.227.194] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 03:20:29 -0800 Received: (qmail 46650 invoked by uid 65534); 10 Feb 2006 11:20:08 -0000 Message-ID: <20060210112008.46649.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: svn commit: r376636 - /forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060210-log.txt Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:20:08 -0000 To: svn@forrest.apache.org From: crossley@apache.org X-Mailer: svnmailer-1.0.6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Author: crossley Date: Fri Feb 10 03:20:04 2006 New Revision: 376636 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=376636&view=rev Log: Update Modified: forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060210-log.txt Modified: forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060210-log.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060210-log.txt?rev=376636&r1=376635&r2=376636&view=diff ============================================================================== --- forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060210-log.txt (original) +++ forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060210-log.txt Fri Feb 10 03:20:04 2006 @@ -117,3 +117,50 @@ [21:14] xley: okay i will go any fix that aspect [21:15] rgardler: I only see "dev" in the context of Forrest core version numbers so we seem to agree [21:16] rgardler: Going to clean zeph, back in 10 mnutes, then on with FOR-711 (LM caching) +[22:01] xley: Ross, when you are back, i would like to have a talk about plugin deployment. +[22:01] rgardler: I'm back - give me a few minutes to write some notes on what I have discovered re FOR-711 - 2 minutes +[22:02] xley: k +[22:05] _Gav_: Ive been out, back to work on Pelt theme, should I work directly in plugin directory on this, or deploy it to a test site +[22:05] _Gav_: What concerns has cheche with this +[22:05] xley: do both +[22:06] _Gav_: ok cheers +[22:06] xley: cheche might be back later today. +[22:06] _Gav_: ok +[22:10] rgardler: OK, David, fire away +[22:11] xley: about plugin deployment ... +[22:11] xley: we have talked about this once before (cannot yet find it) +[22:12] xley: anyway ... +[22:12] xley: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/fo​rrest/site/plugins/ +[22:12] xley: I presume that the 0.8-dev directory is a mistake caused by +[22:12] xley: the badly named version numbers in the plugins/*/build.xml files. +[22:12] xley: Fixed now so i suppose that can be removed. +[22:12] xley: ... +[22:13] rgardler: No... +[22:13] xley: tell me +[22:13] rgardler: I think we may have been at cross-purposes earlier +[22:13] rgardler: I was talking about -dev extension to plugin names +[22:13] rgardler: were you talking about -dev on the forrest version? +[22:14] xley: i also about -dev extension to plugin names ... +[22:14] rgardler: OK +[22:14] xley: the -dev on the forrest version is related ... +[22:14] rgardler: So the 0.8-dev directory is the Forrest core version +[22:14] rgardler: when we release 0.8 that becomes 0.8 (loses the -dev) +[22:14] xley: because that is where the end up being deployed, gotta get both right. +[22:15] rgardler: Can we remove the confusion? Just drop -dev in both cases? +[22:15] » twilliams_ joined the chat room. +[22:15] xley: that is what i wondered too +[22:15] rgardler: I think we can... some background... +[22:16] rgardler: I used the -dev extension (for core) so it matched what is in the docs +[22:16] rgardler: So, dropping it will make it the *only* place we don't use -dev +[22:16] rgardler: But will simplify the release process +[22:17] xley: so what are the zips at the top-level then? +[22:17] rgardler: The top level zips are the current dev version +[22:18] rgardler: I think it is a throw back to pre-versioned plugins +[22:18] rgardler: would have to verify the download process +[22:18] rgardler: we should be able to lose them now +[22:18] rgardler: No.. just remembered +[22:19] xley: :-) glad that we are talking about it +[22:19] rgardler: if you specificy a dev version (-dev) +[22:19] rgardler: it will (used to?) always use the unversioned top level pugin +[22:19] xley: http://casa.che-che.com/~bot/forre​st/forrest.log.10Feb2006 +[22:19] rgardler: thus it made no difference what forrest core version you used