forrest-svn mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
Subject svn commit: r376636 - /forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060210-log.txt
Date Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:20:08 GMT
Author: crossley
Date: Fri Feb 10 03:20:04 2006
New Revision: 376636



Modified: forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060210-log.txt
--- forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060210-log.txt (original)
+++ forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060210-log.txt Fri Feb 10 03:20:04 2006
@@ -117,3 +117,50 @@
 [21:14]      xley: okay i will go any fix that aspect
 [21:15]  rgardler: I only see "dev" in the context of Forrest core version numbers so we
seem to agree
 [21:16] rgardler: Going to clean zeph, back in 10 mnutes, then on with FOR-711 (LM caching)
+[22:01]      xley: Ross, when you are back, i would like to have a talk about plugin deployment.
+[22:01]  rgardler: I'm back - give me a few minutes to write some notes on what I have discovered
re FOR-711 - 2 minutes
+[22:02]      xley: k
+[22:05]     _Gav_: Ive been out, back to work on Pelt theme, should I work directly in plugin
directory on this, or deploy it to a test site
+[22:05] _Gav_: What concerns has cheche with this
+[22:05]      xley: do both
+[22:06]     _Gav_: ok cheers
+[22:06]      xley: cheche might be back later today.
+[22:06]     _Gav_: ok
+[22:10]  rgardler: OK, David, fire away
+[22:11]      xley: about plugin deployment ...
+[22:11] xley: we have talked about this once before (cannot yet find it)
+[22:12] xley: anyway ...
+[22:12] xley:​rrest/site/plugins/
+[22:12] xley: I presume that the 0.8-dev directory is a mistake caused by
+[22:12] xley: the badly named version numbers in the plugins/*/build.xml files.
+[22:12] xley: Fixed now so i suppose that can be removed.
+[22:12] xley: ...
+[22:13]  rgardler: No...
+[22:13]      xley: tell me
+[22:13]  rgardler: I think we may have been at cross-purposes earlier
+[22:13] rgardler: I was talking about -dev extension to plugin names
+[22:13] rgardler: were you talking about -dev on the forrest version?
+[22:14]      xley: i also about -dev extension to plugin names ...
+[22:14]  rgardler: OK
+[22:14]      xley: the -dev on the forrest version is related ...
+[22:14]  rgardler: So the 0.8-dev directory is the Forrest core version
+[22:14] rgardler: when we release 0.8 that becomes 0.8 (loses the -dev)
+[22:14]      xley: because that is where the end up being deployed, gotta get both right.
+[22:15]  rgardler: Can we remove the confusion? Just drop -dev in both cases?
+[22:15] » twilliams_ joined the chat room.
+[22:15]      xley: that is what i wondered too
+[22:15]  rgardler: I think we can... some background...
+[22:16] rgardler: I used the -dev extension (for core) so it matched what is in the docs
+[22:16] rgardler: So, dropping it will make it the *only* place we don't use -dev
+[22:16] rgardler: But will simplify the release process
+[22:17]      xley: so what are the zips at the top-level then?
+[22:17]  rgardler: The top level zips are the current dev version
+[22:18] rgardler: I think it is a throw back to pre-versioned plugins
+[22:18] rgardler: would have to verify the download process
+[22:18] rgardler: we should be able to lose them now
+[22:18] rgardler: No.. just remembered
+[22:19]      xley: :-) glad that we are talking about it
+[22:19]  rgardler: if you specificy a dev version (-dev) 
+[22:19] rgardler: it will (used to?) always use the unversioned top level pugin
+[22:19]      xley:​st/forrest.log.10Feb2006
+[22:19]  rgardler: thus it made no difference what forrest core version you used

View raw message