forrest-svn mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From cross...@apache.org
Subject svn commit: r376618 - /forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060210-log.txt
Date Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:20:10 GMT
Author: crossley
Date: Fri Feb 10 02:20:07 2006
New Revision: 376618

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=376618&view=rev
Log:
Update

Modified:
    forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060210-log.txt

Modified: forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060210-log.txt
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060210-log.txt?rev=376618&r1=376617&r2=376618&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060210-log.txt (original)
+++ forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060210-log.txt Fri Feb 10 02:20:07 2006
@@ -90,3 +90,30 @@
 [20:12] xley: dinner is cooking, back soon.
 [20:12]  Cyriaque: Hi David
 [20:29]     _Gav_: no problem, will do
+[21:01] » rgardler joined the chat room.
+[21:02]  rgardler: Good morning/evening for anyone around.
+[21:02] rgardler: I'm going to be hear on and off today
+[21:02] rgardler: moving office and there has been a problem with the movers
+[21:02] rgardler: Whilst around I will be working on FOR-200
+[21:04]      xley: get those movers moving.
+[21:04]  rgardler: they're moving now :-)
+[21:07]      xley: Re: FOR-200 locationmap, our never-ending issue ...
+[21:08] xley: http://issues.apache.org/jira/brow​se/FOR-726 (lm in plugins) ... what
is the story with the second-last comment
+[21:09] xley: "verify the version numbers in each plugin's build.xml (some use a -dev and
some do not) and in plugins.xml"
+[21:09]  rgardler: OK, I've been meaning to address that for a while, 
+[21:09] rgardler: I need to check some of the install code
+[21:09] rgardler: I know I *planne* something, not sure if I implemented it
+[21:09] rgardler: looking now - back soon
+[21:10] rgardler: (planne = planned)
+[21:10]      xley: i will look too.
+[21:11]  rgardler: I have a feeling the -dev means nothing - I think I went for no versionnumber
meaning latest version in the end
+[21:11]      xley: i wondered that too.
+[21:13]  rgardler: I see no occurance of "dev" in plugins.xml (the build file)
+[21:13] rgardler: therefore my conclusion is that I did go for no version number in the end
+[21:13] rgardler: therefore we should *not* have "-dev" extensions
+[21:13]      xley: i did find and grep "\-dev" in main ... nothing that seems relevant.
+[21:14]  rgardler: (OT my son just ate his first breakfast without assistane - applause for
my son - who now need to be cleaned up)
+[21:14] rgardler: looking at main...
+[21:14]      xley: okay i will go any fix that aspect
+[21:15]  rgardler: I only see "dev" in the context of Forrest core version numbers so we
seem to agree
+[21:16] rgardler: Going to clean zeph, back in 10 mnutes, then on with FOR-711 (LM caching)



Mime
View raw message