forrest-svn mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
Subject svn commit: r368662 - /forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060113-log.txt
Date Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:00:30 GMT
Author: crossley
Date: Fri Jan 13 02:00:28 2006
New Revision: 368662



Modified: forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060113-log.txt
--- forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060113-log.txt (original)
+++ forrest/events/forrest-friday/20060113-log.txt Fri Jan 13 02:00:28 2006
@@ -27,3 +27,20 @@
 Jan 13 21:37:25 <crossley>	Hi Cyriaque, you managed to get connected this time.
 Jan 13 21:37:51 <Cyriaque>	Yes I was wandering if it was working but I now have confirmation
 Jan 13 21:38:30 <crossley>	yes.
+Jan 13 21:40:40 -->	rgardler ( has joined
+Jan 13 21:40:59 <crossley>	hey Europe is waking up all of a sudden.
+Jan 13 21:41:08 <rgardler>	:-)
+Jan 13 21:41:19 <rgardler>	Good morning Europe, evening Aus
+Jan 13 21:43:09 <rgardler>	I'm going to catch up with myu email and then work on FOR-200
+Jan 13 21:43:28 <rgardler>	If anyone needs something to do ;-) they can check the plugins
have all been copied across...
+Jan 13 21:43:35 <rgardler>	I thought I'd done them all last time
+Jan 13 21:43:50 <rgardler>	but a couple seem to have been messed up
+Jan 13 21:43:55 <rgardler>	(probably forgot to svn add)
+Jan 13 21:50:24 <Cyriaque>	Ok, I am going to try to understand dispatcher v3 in order
to adapt pelt contracts.
+Jan 13 21:50:56 <crossley>	rgardler: What do you mean "messed up"? Can you do 'svn
status' at your end?
+Jan 13 21:52:43 <rgardler>	I mean I was convinced I'd done them all, but at least two
(wiki and another that came up onlist) weren't done
+Jan 13 21:53:12 <rgardler>	"svn status" shows I have a uncommitted change to the wiki
plugin (i was working on it the other day)
+Jan 13 21:54:20 <rgardler>	Cyriaque: please se my reply to Davids mail regarding to
branch or not - your comments would be helpful (its radical ;-)
+Jan 13 21:56:21 <crossley>	i will scan through all of trunk/plugins ... not quite sure
what i am looking for.
+Jan 13 21:56:59 <rgardler>	The easiest thing to do is to do an "ant test" in the plugin
+Jan 13 21:59:16 <crossley>	Ah, thanks. But of course also see if each is using locationmap
and also review each locationmap.

View raw message