forrest-svn mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From cross...@apache.org
Subject svn commit: r332506 - /forrest/events/forrest-friday/20051111-log.txt
Date Fri, 11 Nov 2005 10:26:33 GMT
Author: crossley
Date: Fri Nov 11 02:26:30 2005
New Revision: 332506

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332506&view=rev
Log:
Update

Modified:
    forrest/events/forrest-friday/20051111-log.txt

Modified: forrest/events/forrest-friday/20051111-log.txt
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/forrest/events/forrest-friday/20051111-log.txt?rev=332506&r1=332505&r2=332506&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- forrest/events/forrest-friday/20051111-log.txt (original)
+++ forrest/events/forrest-friday/20051111-log.txt Fri Nov 11 02:26:30 2005
@@ -246,3 +246,21 @@
 Nov 11 20:55:00 <diwaker>	make sure you run etc/structurer.sh first
 Nov 11 21:23:25 <diwaker>	any luck?
 Nov 11 21:23:35 *	diwaker is away: sleep
+Nov 11 21:40:21 -->	pbo1 (n=JTZ@dsl-210-211-103-098.sa.veridas.net) has joined #for-n
+Nov 11 21:54:00 <diwaker>	anyone still around?
+Nov 11 22:07:18 <pbo1>	I'm sort of in and out, er, on two machines.
+Nov 11 22:07:18 <--	pbol has quit (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer))
+Nov 11 22:07:29 <pbo1>	that
+Nov 11 22:08:17 <xley>	yeah, i am just back
+Nov 11 22:08:21 <diwaker>	ok cool
+Nov 11 22:08:26 <diwaker>	i'm just planning to tuck in
+Nov 11 22:08:33 <diwaker>	was hoping someone could test the changes
+Nov 11 22:08:36 <diwaker>	so that i can close the issue on JIRA
+Nov 11 22:08:44 <xley>	i will do that now.
+Nov 11 22:08:55 <xley>	see you tomorrow maybe
+Nov 11 22:10:22 <diwaker>	definitely
+Nov 11 22:13:49 <xley>	by the way, don't forget that our zone is doing a continuous
test of the trunk
+Nov 11 22:14:24 <xley>	anyway, i just did 'build test' and it worked. Will do the other
tests that you suggested.
+Nov 11 22:19:22 <xley>	yes the various 'forrest run' worked okay.
+Nov 11 22:24:33 <xley>	so yes, your FOR-697 seems fine.
+Nov 11 22:25:59 <xley>	By the way, another issue: The fonts look terrible at http://forrest.zones.apache.org/ft/build/forrest-sample-2/



Mime
View raw message