forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Brian M Dube (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] Commented: (FOR-1215) The optional use of Cocoon Validation Transformers fails with Jing-20091111
Date Fri, 07 Jan 2011 07:09:48 GMT


Brian M Dube commented on FOR-1215:

I'll describe what I did since I'm not at all up to speed with
Cocoon. Using Cocoon's BRANCH_2_1_X at r1056175, I swapped out the
included Jing (20030619) with 20091111 and updated lib/jars.xml to
reflect that change. Then I excluded all blocks but validation and
built Cocoon. I tested Forrest with the block built against the newer
Jing and validation worked without error.

If the validation block as shipped by Forrest requires any kind of
configuration, I missed that step. But if not, it looks like Jing and
the validation block can be upgraded together without issue.

> The optional use of Cocoon Validation Transformers fails with Jing-20091111
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: FOR-1215
>                 URL:
>             Project: Forrest
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: XML grammars & validation
>    Affects Versions: 0.9-dev
>            Reporter: David Crossley
>             Fix For: 0.10
> The optional use of "Cocoon Validation Transformers" is explained here:
> FOR-1172 enable validation of the internal xml
> This works okay with Jing-20081028
> However with the current release of Jing-20091111 it fails with this message:
> ...
> * [178/93]  [93/135]  0.886s 10.0Kb  linkmap.validation-start.xml
> * [179/92]  [0/0]     0.089s 0b      docs_0_90/howto/howto-buildPlugin.validation.xml
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: ENTITY_RESOLVER
> 	at org.apache.cocoon.components.validation.jing.JingSchemaParser.parseSchema(
> 	at org.apache.cocoon.components.validation.impl.AbstractValidator.getSchema(

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message