Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72025 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2010 10:10:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Jun 2010 10:10:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 91474 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 10:10:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 91334 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2010 10:10:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 91327 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2010 10:10:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 10:10:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.111.4.29] (HELO out5.smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 10:10:31 +0000 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D970FF7DE3 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 06:10:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 01 Jun 2010 06:10:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=UzXISa/yMtBq1XEuYuP/XP3kvUo=; b=CFfrwNYXLE+HddzsBHHDUW53CN8tFrzJHu7EDi0jYkiUCd9Al4yr/Yyq3h45NzFAq+fHSl7LJo2qD5SQqY88ctSEiFI60gXCQMvTkpLihuMBDFteYcrrspnDyQ2B9ZYtc8vOZnPbLijNu22oTP8yYqohko65gvnLuqJnYQvRPmI= X-Sasl-enc: heF+PJxlotPBz5JEqCx6KtY0dbD++A8knoF8P+5g7537 1275387009 Received: from localhost (dsl-41-216.wholesaledsl.com.au [125.168.41.216]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D8CB4C7F25 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 06:10:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 20:10:06 +1000 From: David Crossley To: dev@forrest.apache.org Subject: Re: trouble publishing project docs Message-ID: <20100601101006.GD10373@igg.local> References: <20100527013619.GB54036@igg.local> <20100528072429.GE54036@igg.local> <015101cafe3d$87bd22e0$973768a0$@com.au> <20100531050431.GB2299@igg.local> <20100601031658.GB6213@igg.local> <1275371195.418630033@192.168.2.227> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1275371195.418630033@192.168.2.227> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sina K. Heshmati wrote: > > I think we should stop using the svncommit and svncheckout tasks since: > > - There's almost no documentation available for them. > - They don't remove the need for executing the svn command. > > Maybe we could consider using [1], which is BTW released under ASL 1.1 [2]. > > Kind regards, > Sina > > [1] http://subclipse.tigris.org/svnant.html > [2] http://subclipse.tigris.org/licenses/svnAnt.html Thanks Sina. However, if i read correctly then the version of SvnAnt is "bound against subversion" to a particular version of Subversion. So i suppose that we would need to provide different versions of SvnAnt to match their client version. Sounds messy. I like Tim's suggestion better. -David