forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cyriaque Dupoirieux <>
Subject Re: Merging back the dispatcher
Date Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:51:31 GMT
le 22/04/2010 12:24 Ross Gardler a écrit :
> On 22/04/2010 00:54, Tim Williams wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Tim Williams<>  wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 9:38 PM, David Crossley<>  wrote:
>>>> Tim Williams wrote:
>>>>> reason I ask, is that we have FOR-1198 and FOR-796 both as "blockers"
>>>> No such issue. Rather FOR-1108 and FOR-796.
>>> Arghh, typo, Thanks David.  So, are we leaving dispatcher in the
>>> whiteboard for now?
>> Hate to be a nag, but... are we leaving dispatcher in the whiteboard
>> for the 0.9 release?  It's complicated b/c we have [at least] two
>> things working at odds here:  1) dispatcher has come to be in popular
>> use despite its status and 2) being in the whiteboard, it wouldn't
>> make it in the actual release.
>> So, thoughts?
> I've wanted dispatcher in core since the 0.8 release for this very reason.
> However, now I'm only an observer here I'll refrain from arguing for or 
> against, just settle with pointing out that I think it would be a 
> mistake to leave it out of 0.9 unless it were to delay the release 
> unreasonably (ahem).
> If it doesn't go in I would want to see a 0.10 within months with 
> dispatcher in.
I agree with you Ross,
I think forrest needs a new release to make it clear that forrest is not
But we should also think about a R0.10 planned ASAP.
(We discussed this one or two years ago and decided at this time that it
should be great to be able to plan new releases every 3 or four months...)

> Ross

View raw message