forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Williams <william...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: board: r19010 - /foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt
Date Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:56:37 GMT
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Tim Williams<williamstw@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is that repository only for Members?  I see "board" in committers but
> it doesn't have the reports in them.  Are they public once final?

It looks like the minutes are available, but the comments aren't,
right?  Unless, of course, I'm missing them somewhere...

http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2009/board_minutes_2009_05_20.txt

--tim

>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Ross Gardler<rgardler@apache.org> wrote:
>> I just noticed this addition to the board report for Forrest and have
>> not noticed a copy of it going to our developer list.
>>
>> I totally agree with this addition and thank David for adding it. My
>> purpose for forwarding here is to highlight this issue to the widest
>> possible community.
>>
>> In short we would welcome someone building a release for Forrest -
>> anyone can do it and as David says it is well documented (and I'm sure
>> people will come out of the woodwork to help in the odd spare minute).
>>
>> Ross
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From:  <crossley@apache.org>
>> Date: 2009/8/19
>> Subject: board: r19010 - /foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt
>> To: board-cvs@apache.org
>>
>>
>> Author: crossley
>> Date: Wed Aug 19 08:03:49 2009
>> New Revision: 19010
>>
>> Log:
>> Reply to Forrest comment from rf.
>>
>> Modified:
>>    foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt
>>
>> Modified: foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt (original)
>> +++ foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt Wed Aug 19 08:03:49 2009
>> @@ -435,6 +435,12 @@
>>        [ approved: jj, dc, rf
>>          comments:
>>            rf: no releases in 2.33 years? why not?
>> +     crossley: One reason is that no one has stepped forward to be the Release
>> +               Manager. As we all know, that takes some effort. Also as our
>> +               past board reports indicate, the developers seem busy with
other
>> +               things. It could release now as-is, the process is well-defined.
>> +               There are some improvements that developers have hoped to
>> +               integrate, but not yet managed to do.
>>          ]
>>
>>     L. Apache HTTP Server Project [William A. Rowe Jr. / Brett]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ross Gardler
>>
>> OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research
>> http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk
>>
>

Mime
View raw message