forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Williams <william...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: board: r19010 - /foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt
Date Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:49:53 GMT
Is that repository only for Members?  I see "board" in committers but
it doesn't have the reports in them.  Are they public once final?

Thanks,
--tim

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Ross Gardler<rgardler@apache.org> wrote:
> I just noticed this addition to the board report for Forrest and have
> not noticed a copy of it going to our developer list.
>
> I totally agree with this addition and thank David for adding it. My
> purpose for forwarding here is to highlight this issue to the widest
> possible community.
>
> In short we would welcome someone building a release for Forrest -
> anyone can do it and as David says it is well documented (and I'm sure
> people will come out of the woodwork to help in the odd spare minute).
>
> Ross
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From:  <crossley@apache.org>
> Date: 2009/8/19
> Subject: board: r19010 - /foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt
> To: board-cvs@apache.org
>
>
> Author: crossley
> Date: Wed Aug 19 08:03:49 2009
> New Revision: 19010
>
> Log:
> Reply to Forrest comment from rf.
>
> Modified:
>    foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt
>
> Modified: foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt
> ==============================================================================
> --- foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt (original)
> +++ foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt Wed Aug 19 08:03:49 2009
> @@ -435,6 +435,12 @@
>        [ approved: jj, dc, rf
>          comments:
>            rf: no releases in 2.33 years? why not?
> +     crossley: One reason is that no one has stepped forward to be the Release
> +               Manager. As we all know, that takes some effort. Also as our
> +               past board reports indicate, the developers seem busy with other
> +               things. It could release now as-is, the process is well-defined.
> +               There are some improvements that developers have hoped to
> +               integrate, but not yet managed to do.
>          ]
>
>     L. Apache HTTP Server Project [William A. Rowe Jr. / Brett]
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ross Gardler
>
> OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research
> http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk
>

Mime
View raw message