Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:32:28 +1000
From: David Crossley <crossley@apache.org>
To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r783443 - in /forrest/site: ./ docs_0_90/
 docs_0_90/howto/ docs_0_90/howto/cvs-ssh/ docs_0_90/howto/multi/ dtdx/ plan/
 pluginDocs/ pluginDocs/plugins_0_70/ pluginDocs/plugins_0_80/
 pluginDocs/plugins_0_90/ procedures/ procedures/relea
Message-ID: <20090616023228.GA272@igg.indexgeo.com.au>
References: <499888440906101147x50414c06u3a74236666319f67@mail.gmail.com>
 <1244663391.751810316@192.168.1.35>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1244663391.751810316@192.168.1.35>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i

Sina Khakbaz Heshmati wrote:
> Tim Williams wrote:
> >
> > What else was intended to have changed?  The number of changed files
> > is surprising...
> 
> The number of changes (r783443 [1]) is relatively big indeed but when I compared it with e.g. that of the last the last commit (r782542 [2]), and I thought this should be normal. 

All is okay ... 108 changed files in [2] and 107 in [1].

> The reason we were both surprised is _probably_ because svn updates all the PDF files regardless of whether they have been logically updated since FOP timestamps every file it generates (according to FAQ Question 1.2. in [3].)

Yes that is the problem. FOP adds a datestamp to every PDF.

Thanks for your thorough answer.

> Sina
> 
> [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=783443
> [2] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=782542
> [3] http://forrest.apache.org/howto-forrestbot-svn.html
>