Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 15538 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2009 23:22:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Mar 2009 23:22:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 5099 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2009 22:22:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 5064 invoked by uid 500); 18 Mar 2009 22:22:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 5055 invoked by uid 99); 18 Mar 2009 22:22:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:22:36 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.111.4.28] (HELO out4.smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:22:28 +0000 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C282F5704 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:22:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:22:07 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: dOAp8GPvzsMSpuBc/94OndIoqMfMzk9kxqCKnynsvAeC 1237414925 Received: from localhost (dsl-41-216.nsw1.net.au [125.168.41.216]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7028231BC1 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:22:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:22:07 +1100 From: David Crossley To: dev@forrest.apache.org Subject: murmurs of a release Message-ID: <20090318222207.GG308@igg.indexgeo.com.au> References: <20090218074845.GA2821@igg.indexgeo.com.au> <1236286751.31925.41.camel@kenny> <9B22115C39244A9492300E98D62732BB@developer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9B22115C39244A9492300E98D62732BB@developer> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Gavin wrote: > Thorsten Scherler > > > > I hope that people will give me support (as they always did) when > > I shortly will merge back the dispatcher rewrite and volunteer to > > get a long overdue forrest 0.9 release out. > > That would be good. I'm afraid I have not looked at your branch. Of course I will when it gets into trunk as that???s what I tend to work on. I will also try to test the branch out on Windows before the merger. > > When are you planning on doing this ? Is there some overview of what is involved in merging the disptacher? What i wonder about is that our current demos on the zone use the "dispatcher" in whiteboard/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.internal.dispatcher and i don't understand how that relates to whiteboard/dispatcher/ and then what the difference is with the new branch. Is this also about making dispatcher the default instead of skins? If so, there would need to be a large docs effort. Release would be easier if we left that phase until later. > I have only ever know David to perform a release, I would have thought he would need to be around for a release whether being RM or not, at least until someone else has done it. No, i don't need to be. Hopefully i have left sufficient notes after last time. See the doc [1] below and see the mail archives leading up to the last release. Before me it was Jeff. Thankfully when i first did it there were some basic notes from him. I worked out how to do it by looking at other project's releases, e.g. Cocoon-2.1, HTTP Server, and the great notes from Stefan and others. Our Forrest notes have evolved. I needed to refer to them for every release and refine them every time. Ferdinand helped to expand the documentation. [1] http://forrest.apache.org/procedures/release/How_to_release.html Each time we have managed to streamline the process a little more. Whoever takes on the Release Manager task, beware. Every project's release notes advise their RM to allocate a lot of time. > In fact, I'd go as far to say we need many people around for a release, the lists are quiet currently, all the main contributors of the past releases are very busy these days. > > In other words, I'm not sure who else will be around if a release were to happen soon. Doing such co-ordination is one of the early tasks for the RM. -David