Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:48:49 +1000
From: David Crossley <crossley@apache.org>
To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Proposal] use Cocoon-2.1
Message-ID: <20080828014849.GE29316@igg.indexgeo.com.au>
References: <20080823075906.GB11965@igg.indexgeo.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080823075906.GB11965@igg.indexgeo.com.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i

David Crossley wrote:
> 
> This proposal is to go with Option 2, i.e. use Cocoon-2.1 branch.
[snip]
> 
> This will not preclude doing either Option 1 or
> Option 3 (or some other) at a later stage.
[snip]
> 
> Please do more testing and also on your own projects.

That would be good, but not really the objective of
this discussion. It may uncover a huge impediment,
but is looking fine so far.

> Please raise any concerns that you might have about
> going down this route.

This is the main thing.

> After discussion settles and it seems that we have
> reached consensus, then we will probably hold a vote
> to confirm it.

It would be good to get the branch merged back ASAP.
That would also enable others to create branches more
easily.

I feel that we have reached consensus already and done
so very efficiently. Going to start the vote now.
It still gives us one week to reveal any concerns.

-David