Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 21343 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2008 17:59:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Aug 2008 17:59:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 45622 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2008 17:59:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 45584 invoked by uid 500); 27 Aug 2008 17:59:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 45573 invoked by uid 99); 27 Aug 2008 17:59:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:59:19 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [81.169.146.181] (HELO mo-p05-ob.rzone.de) (81.169.146.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:58:21 +0000 X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 X-RZG-AUTH: :YSxENQjhO8Rlyg/MLWdi28qVCFAC Received: from [192.168.1.33] (154.Red-80-39-37.staticIP.rima-tde.net [80.39.37.154]) by post.webmailer.de (fruni mo49) (RZmta 16.47) with ESMTP id Y00b4ck7REpPxX for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:55:04 +0200 (MEST) (envelope-from: ) Subject: Re: Could Forrest use Hudson? From: Thorsten Scherler To: dev@forrest.apache.org In-Reply-To: <006201c90767$f6fa6240$0200a8c0@developer> References: <006201c90767$f6fa6240$0200a8c0@developer> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:53:51 +0200 Message-Id: <1219859631.6000.29.camel@cartman> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 20:39 +1000, Gavin wrote: > Just wondering, ... > So, thoughts, useful or not, if so , where ? Continuous integration tools are very helpful in general, however I see it a wee bit like Ross (pointing our we have little java code) and David (pointing out we have Gump). More I am completely share their point in involvement: I cannot offer any time to support this move, sorry. salu2 -- Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions