David Crossley wrote:
>
> This proposal is to go with Option 2, i.e. use Cocoon-2.1 branch.
[snip]
>
> This will not preclude doing either Option 1 or
> Option 3 (or some other) at a later stage.
[snip]
>
> Please do more testing and also on your own projects.
That would be good, but not really the objective of
this discussion. It may uncover a huge impediment,
but is looking fine so far.
> Please raise any concerns that you might have about
> going down this route.
This is the main thing.
> After discussion settles and it seems that we have
> reached consensus, then we will probably hold a vote
> to confirm it.
It would be good to get the branch merged back ASAP.
That would also enable others to create branches more
easily.
I feel that we have reached consensus already and done
so very efficiently. Going to start the vote now.
It still gives us one week to reveal any concerns.
-David
|