Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91899 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2007 19:06:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Aug 2007 19:06:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 47752 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2007 19:06:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 47714 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2007 19:06:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 97168 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2007 13:45:10 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dom@w3.org designates 128.30.52.30 as permitted sender) Subject: Re: Legal Notice in Individual SKOS Glossaries Missing From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux To: sina@khakbaz.com Cc: public-glossary@w3.org, Apache Forrest Dev List In-Reply-To: <36538.192.168.1.71.1186149792.webmail@192.168.1.71> References: <36538.192.168.1.71.1186149792.webmail@192.168.1.71> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Organization: W3C Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 15:44:27 +0200 Message-Id: <1186494272.8682.244.camel@altostratustier> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, Le vendredi 03 août 2007 à 16:03 +0200, Sina K. Heshmati a écrit : > A few glossaries that are made available [2] by the W3C Glossary and Dictionary Project [3] in SKOS format have been selected to serve as samples to demonstrate > how the plugin aggregates content from external sources. > > As a result, the content from an external source may be presented in pages with > Apache copyright statement. Therefore, we need to make sure that the right legal > notice is associated with the aggregated content. To that end, I was wondering > if a project committer could add an explicit legal notice to SKOS glossaries [2], > so that we'll be able to refer to those resources in our source code. I have added the following notice to most glossaries in the W3C glossary: There is once instance where the license terms refer to a different URI (the one for the HTTP spec), and one for which the licensing terms are undefined (and for which I didn't set any value). Hope this helps, Dom > [1] http://forrest.apache.org/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/glossary-project/data/glossaries/ > [3] http://www.w3.org/QA/2003/01/Glossary