Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <46201BBB.2060201@apache.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 01:09:31 +0100
From: Ross Gardler <rgardler@apache.org>
Organization: OSS Watch
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Subject: Re: calling all developers, test release candidate
References: <20070412022447.GH8244@igg.indexgeo.com.au>
 <461DEC41.1030101@xtstelecom.com> <461FD39B.2050109@apache.org>
 <461FD66A.5020804@apache.org> <20070413231825.GO7676@igg.indexgeo.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <20070413231825.GO7676@igg.indexgeo.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

David Crossley wrote:
> Ross Gardler wrote:
>> Ross Gardler wrote:
>>> Olivier Parent wrote:
>>>> here is my test run with the following environment:
>>>> OK    forrest war ... use your own full Jetty or Tomcat.
>>>>
>>>> Test with apache-tomcat-5.5.12 : OK overall
>>>> FAIL - the "plugins" link does not work (was OK when running with 
>>>> Forrest-Jetty)
>>>>     "/my-project/pluginDocs/plugins_0_70/index.html" could not be found
>>> I'm now onto testing the war targets.
>>>
>>> So will try and reproduce this error.
>> OK, I reproduced it.
>>
>> (in tomcat 6, but that's not relevant to this issue)
>>
>> The war works fine apart from this issue, at least as far as I can see.
>>
>> The issue is caused by the fact that the war is mounted at 
>> localhost:8080/my-project rather than localhost:8080
>>
>> The match in sitemap.xmap is:
>>
>> <map:match pattern="pluginDocs/plugins_(.*)/index(|\.source).xml" 
>> type="regexp">
>>
>> So it fails.
>>
>> This is certainly an issue, but it is not one that is likely to actually 
>> affect users and is easy to fix in 0.8.1 or 0.9.
>>
>> I don't see the need for a new RC1 for this issue.
> 
> As you suggest, developers would be the ones to use
> the plugins index. Most likely would use 'forrest run'
> for development.

It's even less wide ranging than that. The problem only shows up when 
building a war of a freshly seeded site.

Ross