Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <460838B0.6090405@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:18:40 +0100
From: Ross Gardler <rgardler@apache.org>
Organization: OSS Watch
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Subject: Re: Constant Revision No in sitemap.xmap
References: <4608209A.7060307@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <4608209A.7060307@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
> I have started working on FOR-922 adjusting sitemap-references to the
> changes in the sitemap.
> What I'm confused about is that the cited (old) sitemap as well as the
> current one display the same revision number in the head of the file
> 
>> $Revision: 1.12 $
> 
> How can that be after all these changes? Or is that number a left-over
> from pre subversion times?

We don't use SVN keywords for managing the revision number. SVN does a 
much better job of it.

I guess this is a throw back to when we used SVN.

> Btw:
> That method of converting the sitemap to an html-file in hindsight seems
> really a bit waste of time.
> So instead I'm planning on putting commented markers into the sitemap
> and refer to those in the document.

Sounds good.

Ross