Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-26678-apmail-forrest-dev-archive=forrest.apache.org@forrest.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 24345 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2007 09:01:41 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2007 09:01:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 318 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2007 09:01:50 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org
Received: (qmail 276 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2007 09:01:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@forrest.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@forrest.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@forrest.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org
List-Id: <dev.forrest.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org
Received: (qmail 265 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2007 09:01:49 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 01:01:49 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [163.1.2.161] (HELO relay2.mail.ox.ac.uk) (163.1.2.161)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 01:01:39 -0800
Received: from smtp2.mail.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.205])
	by relay2.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <rgardler@apache.org>)
	id 1HOVXp-00020s-8I
	for dev@forrest.apache.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 09:01:17 +0000
Received: from oucs-rossg.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.101.125])
	by smtp2.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <rgardler@apache.org>)
	id 1HOVXo-00020N-8w
	for dev@forrest.apache.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 09:01:16 +0000
Message-ID: <45ED2DDC.1010804@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 09:01:16 +0000
From: Ross Gardler <rgardler@apache.org>
Organization: OSS Watch
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r514581 - /forrest/trunk/site-author/skinconf.xml
References: <20070305070919.BD5911A981A@eris.apache.org>
 <45EBE0B9.7080901@apache.org> <20070305220654.GH6144@igg.indexgeo.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <20070305220654.GH6144@igg.indexgeo.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Oxford-Username: oucs0040
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

David Crossley wrote:
> Ross Gardler wrote:
>> crossley@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: crossley
>>> Date: Sun Mar  4 23:09:18 2007
>>> New Revision: 514581
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=514581
>>> Log:
>>> Already 2007 already.
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>>    forrest/trunk/site-author/skinconf.xml
>>>
>>> Modified: forrest/trunk/site-author/skinconf.xml
>>> URL: 
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/forrest/trunk/site-author/skinconf.xml?view=diff&rev=514581&r1=514580&r2=514581
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- forrest/trunk/site-author/skinconf.xml (original)
>>> +++ forrest/trunk/site-author/skinconf.xml Sun Mar  4 23:09:18 2007
>>> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
>>>   <favicon-url>favicon.ico</favicon-url>
>>>
>>>   <!-- The following are used to construct a copyright statement -->
>>> -  <year>2002-2006</year>
>>> +  <year>2002-2007</year>
>>>   <vendor>The Apache Software Foundation.</vendor>
>>>   <copyright-link>http://www.apache.org/licenses/</copyright-link>
>>
>> There was loads of discussion about this on the legal-discuss@a.o lists 
>> in 2005 to 2006 changeover. My recollection of the conclusion was that 
>> we only change the the copyright year if there is a significant change 
>> in the file, not just because the date has rolled over.
> 
> In general i agree. That is also one big benefit from the new
> source headers.
> 
> However this change was for the generated pages of our website.
> Others projects (e.g. jackrabbit.apache.org) do it that way too.

Yeah, that makes sense. Thanks for clarifying.

Ross