David Crossley wrote:
> Ross Gardler wrote:
>> crossley@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: crossley
>>> Date: Sun Mar  4 23:09:18 2007
>>> New Revision: 514581
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=514581
>>> Log:
>>> Already 2007 already.
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>>    forrest/trunk/site-author/skinconf.xml
>>>
>>> Modified: forrest/trunk/site-author/skinconf.xml
>>> URL: 
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/forrest/trunk/site-author/skinconf.xml?view=diff&rev=514581&r1=514580&r2=514581
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- forrest/trunk/site-author/skinconf.xml (original)
>>> +++ forrest/trunk/site-author/skinconf.xml Sun Mar  4 23:09:18 2007
>>> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
>>>   <favicon-url>favicon.ico</favicon-url>
>>>
>>>   <!-- The following are used to construct a copyright statement -->
>>> -  <year>2002-2006</year>
>>> +  <year>2002-2007</year>
>>>   <vendor>The Apache Software Foundation.</vendor>
>>>   <copyright-link>http://www.apache.org/licenses/</copyright-link>
>>
>> There was loads of discussion about this on the legal-discuss@a.o lists 
>> in 2005 to 2006 changeover. My recollection of the conclusion was that 
>> we only change the the copyright year if there is a significant change 
>> in the file, not just because the date has rolled over.
> 
> In general i agree. That is also one big benefit from the new
> source headers.
> 
> However this change was for the generated pages of our website.
> Others projects (e.g. jackrabbit.apache.org) do it that way too.

Yeah, that makes sense. Thanks for clarifying.

Ross