Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30890 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2006 03:01:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Sep 2006 03:01:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 16719 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2006 03:01:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 16663 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2006 03:01:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 16652 invoked by uid 99); 23 Sep 2006 03:01:21 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.84) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 20:01:21 -0700 Authentication-Results: idunn.apache.osuosl.org smtp.mail=brightoncomputers@brightontown.com.au; spf=permerror X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= Received-SPF: error (idunn.apache.osuosl.org: domain brightontown.com.au from 203.121.192.7 cause and error) Received: from [203.121.192.7] ([203.121.192.7:48341] helo=mail.e-wire.net.au) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 2.1.1.8 r(12930)) with ESMTP id E5/E1-25616-E73A4154 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 20:01:21 -0700 Received: from developer (mail.e-wire.net.au [127.0.0.1]) by mail.e-wire.net.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k8N31Dkr004616 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:01:15 +0800 Received: from 203-121-204-130.e-wire.net.au [203.121.204.130] for mail.e-wire.net.au (EHLO developer) via SMTP; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:01:15 +0800 From: "Gav...." To: Subject: RE: FOR-635 Revisted Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 11:01:10 +0800 Message-ID: <00a001c6debc$86ac6220$6d0fa8c0@developer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <009101c6deaf$000db820$6d0fa8c0@developer> Thread-Index: AcbeS2hcOXo5V/ObS8GWG7REASgeVAAXDstQAAT/m5A= X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 X-BitDefender-SpamStamp: 1.1.4 049000040111AQAAAAEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQ X-BitDefender-Spam: No (0) X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > -----Original Message----- > From: Gav.... [mailto:brightoncomputers@brightontown.com.au] > Sent: Saturday, 23 September 2006 9:24 AM > To: dev@forrest.apache.org > Subject: RE: FOR-635 Revisted > > Ok, So I'm just thinking out loud here so if anyone can jump in and > Fill out any missing steps :) > > > > Regardless, as David points out, this is not skin specific because we get > the same results for dispatcher - unless ultimately dispatcher also > Uses document-to-fo.xsl. Still thinking out loud here. So dispatcher uses its own resources.xmap which mimicks the main resources.xmap, changed only slightly, processing of the images Seems to be the same. Dispatcher also has its own document2fo.xsl - yes that's right, it has Not been renamed document-to-fo.xsl yet. Either way, this reveals then that the problem COULD therefore be in the Processing of the image paths inside document-to-fo.xsl and document2fo.xsl Because if there is a mistake, it is in both of them, meaning that if the Problem exists in skins and dispatcher, which it does, it does NOT mean that The fault lies elsewhere as first thought. In fact as the processing of Images in both resources.xmap seems to be ok, I might try changing Document-to-fo.xsl around again as I tried originally and see what happens. I can not see where else pdf processing is happening, so someone stop me if You think I heading back in the wrong direction - I was put off going here Before IIRC but seem to be drawn back in again :) Gav... > > Gav... > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.8/455 - Release Date: 9/22/2006