Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 7517 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2006 21:28:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Aug 2006 21:28:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 34505 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2006 21:28:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 34450 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2006 21:28:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 34439 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2006 21:28:24 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:28:24 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [212.23.3.140] (HELO pythagoras.zen.co.uk) (212.23.3.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:28:23 -0700 Received: from [82.69.78.226] (helo=[192.168.0.9]) by pythagoras.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GDpPG-0000E3-Ug for dev@forrest.apache.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:28:03 +0000 Message-ID: <44E4DF56.1020903@apache.org> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:27:50 +0100 From: Ross Gardler User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@forrest.apache.org Subject: Re: [RT] A new Forrest implementation? References: <44E0D61D.40306@apache.org> <20060817081336.GF3778@igg.indexgeo.com.au> <44E44BAD.2050309@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <44E44BAD.2050309@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-Pythagoras-IP: [82.69.78.226] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > So, one possibility for you could be to discuss some things within > Cocoon and perhaps we can fix these issues together. This is certainly one possible outcome from this thread. I've mentioned somewhere else in this thread that if we don't rebuild Forrest then we, as a community, have to help the Cocoon project realise some of its goals. Ross