Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54910 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2006 20:28:46 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jul 2006 20:28:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 89255 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2006 20:28:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 89084 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2006 20:28:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 89073 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2006 20:28:44 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 13:28:44 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [212.23.3.142] (HELO rutherford.zen.co.uk) (212.23.3.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 13:28:42 -0700 Received: from [82.69.78.226] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by rutherford.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1FxV1p-0004w6-Rx for dev@forrest.apache.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 20:28:21 +0000 Message-ID: <44A97DDE.5050402@apache.org> Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 21:28:14 +0100 From: Ross Gardler User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@forrest.apache.org Subject: Re: ODT license compatibility References: <1388877740.20060703182931@soethe.net> In-Reply-To: <1388877740.20060703182931@soethe.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-Rutherford-IP: [82.69.78.226] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Ferdinand Soethe wrote: > So we can offer OpenDocument-plugins as part of Forrest. Thanks for finally getting a concrete answer for us. > I did _not_ ask about including OpenOffice.org code in our distribution. > So this is still an open question. No, this is not an open question, here is the answer... OOo 1 is under the SISSL, OOo 2 is under the LGPL Both are excluded licenses and cannot be included with ASL licensed products. Ross