forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cyriaque Dupoirieux <Cyriaque.Dupoiri...@pcotech.fr>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (FOR-797) Move all v3 resources and code to the new plugins
Date Tue, 02 May 2006 07:20:34 GMT
le 29/04/2006 00:25 Ross Gardler a écrit :
> Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote:
>> le 21/04/2006 20:44 Thorsten Scherler a écrit :
>>
>>> El vie, 21-04-2006 a las 09:55 +0200, Cyriaque Dupoirieux escribió:
>>>  
>>>
>>>> le 21/04/2006 01:21 Thorsten Scherler (JIRA) a écrit :
>>>>   
>>>>>     [ 
>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-797?page=comments#action_12375442

>>>>> ]
>>>>> Thorsten Scherler commented on FOR-797:
>>>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> We should remove following contracts:
>>>>>
>>>>> content-feeder.ft -> this is actually a feed2htmlSnippet contract

>>>>> but to clumpsy
>>>>> content-main-lenya.ft -> obsolete
>>>>> content-include-html.ft -> obsolete, can be done with genericXhtml
>>>>> content-ls-contracts.ft -> never used
>>>>>         
>>>>
>>>> Was this the contract which displayed a list of available contracts 
>>>> (standard and custom) ?
>>>>     
>>>
>>>
>>> yes, but IMO that is not really suitable since the descriptions are
>>> quite big.
>>> Why do you ask, do you think we should keep it?
>>>   
>>
>> If your are talking about the content-ls-contracts, I think it was 
>> very nice and useful to have an automatic generated documentation of 
>> every contracts available for a project.
>> It was also interesting to generate the page and include it in the 
>> forrest site - in the dispatcher documentation - just like we do with 
>> the DTDs.
>
> Like Cyriaque I don't fully understand the problem that Thorsten sees. 

> But I do think auto generated documentation like this is a very good idea.
You do or you don't think ?
(The "But" at the beginning of your sentence leave me puzzled... )

Cyriaque,
> If it is replaced with something better then fine, go ahead and remove 
> it, otherwise lets keep it since it is the best we have.
>
> Ross
>
>

Mime
View raw message