Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <44529670.7040608@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 23:25:52 +0100
From: Ross Gardler <rgardler@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (FOR-797) Move all v3 resources and code to
 the new plugins
References: <858678.1145575266076.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
	 <44489005.6070601@pcotech.fr>
 <1145645062.8107.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <445205A2.40704@pcotech.fr>
In-Reply-To: <445205A2.40704@pcotech.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote:
> le 21/04/2006 20:44 Thorsten Scherler a =C3=A9crit :
>=20
>> El vie, 21-04-2006 a las 09:55 +0200, Cyriaque Dupoirieux escribi=C3=B3=
:
>> =20
>>
>>> le 21/04/2006 01:21 Thorsten Scherler (JIRA) a =C3=A9crit :
>>>   =20
>>>
>>>>     [=20
>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-797?page=3Dcomments#action_=
12375442=20
>>>> ]
>>>> Thorsten Scherler commented on FOR-797:
>>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> We should remove following contracts:
>>>>
>>>> content-feeder.ft -> this is actually a feed2htmlSnippet contract=20
>>>> but to clumpsy
>>>> content-main-lenya.ft -> obsolete
>>>> content-include-html.ft -> obsolete, can be done with genericXhtml
>>>> content-ls-contracts.ft -> never used
>>>>        =20
>>>
>>> Was this the contract which displayed a list of available contracts=20
>>> (standard and custom) ?
>>>    =20
>>
>>
>> yes, but IMO that is not really suitable since the descriptions are
>> quite big.
>> Why do you ask, do you think we should keep it?
>>  =20
>=20
> If your are talking about the content-ls-contracts, I think it was very=
=20
> nice and useful to have an automatic generated documentation of every=20
> contracts available for a project.
> It was also interesting to generate the page and include it in the=20
> forrest site - in the dispatcher documentation - just like we do with=20
> the DTDs.

Like Cyriaque I don't fully understand the problem that Thorsten sees.=20
But I do think auto generated documentation like this is a very good=20
idea. If it is replaced with something better then fine, go ahead and=20
remove it, otherwise lets keep it since it is the best we have.

Ross