Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 26031 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2006 04:52:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Apr 2006 04:52:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 57111 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2006 04:52:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 57069 invoked by uid 500); 21 Apr 2006 04:52:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 57058 invoked by uid 99); 21 Apr 2006 04:52:51 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 21:52:51 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [80.67.18.16] (HELO smtprelay04.ispgateway.de) (80.67.18.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 21:52:50 -0700 Received: (qmail 18388 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2006 04:52:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [10.129.132.188]) (305514@[212.23.126.5]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay04.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 21 Apr 2006 04:52:28 -0000 Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 06:52:11 +0200 From: Ferdinand Soethe X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1075804507.20060421065211@soethe.net> To: dev@forrest.apache.org Subject: Re: 'OpenDocument' or 'odt' + mailing list question In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Web Maestro Clay wrote: > I just noticed that we've got a new plugin: > $FORREST_HOME/whiteboard/plugins/ > org.apache.forrest.plugin.input.OpenDocument > Before I spend time updating on this, which will be the final plugin > we'll use? I'd say that we'll certainly keep this one because it has the more common name. But as I have written in the thread on the odt-plugin I would still like to have the question answered how much it would take to make the old OpenOffice-plug-in support openDocument, simply because it seemed a lot further in terms of features and maturity. I think it would be great if s.o. working on the new plug-in could at least take the time to compare both approaches and see how they can be merged into one unified plugin that supports both. > Also, where should discussion of modifications go? dev@lenya.a.o or > dev@forrest.a.o? Well since these are Forrest plug-ins using Forrest technology and transforming to the current or future Forrest base format I'd say it should happen here. -- Ferdinand Soethe