forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Crossley <cross...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [Proposal] remove active/inactive concept
Date Fri, 21 Apr 2006 23:51:01 GMT
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> David Crossley escribi??:
> > Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
> ...
> > > > The term "Active PMC members" seems to cause
> > > > confusion about who has a binding vote. It was
> > > > intended to just clarify the Unanimous and
> > > > 2/3 Majority situations, so that we didn't need
> > > > to chase people and force them to vote. The word
> > > > "Active" would now be removed.
> > > 
> > > > So for the 2/3 Majority situation, the chair can
> > > > decide on a case-by-case basis if a quorum has
> > > > been reached.
> > > 
> > > Why not simply talk about 2/3 of the votes (those who choose to vote)
> > > within a reasonable time frame?
> > 
> > Hey, good idea. I reckon that would remove the
> > ambiguity about who has binding votes.
> 
> Does that mean all votes are binding (committer as well)?

Only PMC member votes are binding.
See our Guidelines.

-David

Mime
View raw message