Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 79569 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2006 02:19:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2006 02:19:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 93254 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2006 02:19:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 93214 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2006 02:19:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 93203 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2006 02:19:43 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:19:43 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of williamstw@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.193 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.193] (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.193) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:19:42 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so545178wra for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:19:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=L1IB5Ma4uO6vzp8JL+OQD7p7brwfKgRKP2YmbyGyAIx75Kel9w00iSOb6mlCAgwHySRfCUZjk45oTX6FDa0XwA7B59Jg/1RevjBNA//956NicexwghQApcf/a1DIrftpu7HRDWUrl2SsRDbvDanKy6KdjcnVyzzeCFnb4Av7M90= Received: by 10.54.151.7 with SMTP id y7mr2270649wrd; Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:19:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.124.17 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 18:19:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <499888440603081819h59ffbefas9738d61464e845e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 21:19:21 -0500 From: "Tim Williams" To: dev@forrest.apache.org Subject: Re: Forrest history (was Re: svn commit: r384121) In-Reply-To: <1141863726.8483.63.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060308051923.51916.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <1141863726.8483.63.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I'm probably a unique case in that I don't particular want credit for anything I've done here. I'm usually dissatisfied with most code I've written within a couple weeks of having written it so long-lasting credit for it is the last thing I want. I do, however, like to be associated with this community. > What about http://cocoon.apache.org/history.html? It's worth pointing out that you use a stale page as your example.=20 Interesting, because that is what any "history" page is likely to become. Those who know it don't have time or the itch to write it. > It is not *ownership* that "is the website of the dispatcher inventor: > Thorsten Scherler" claims but stating the matter of fact. I could be wrong but I don't think that ownership was what David's primary concern was - I gather his concern is more about crediting individual contributions. Specifically about us as a community putting a high-priority on crediting individual contributions. It's enough that we're progressing as a community and project - individual contributions are important but not as important as our collective progress. > I had the itch > and scratched it (and still do) as a historical fact. ;) And that historical fact will forever be recorded in mail archives, svn logs, and relevant changes.html. Bottom line: we know who to [svn] blame;) > Stefano Mazzocchi is the inventor of cocoon and Sir Berners-Lee is the > inventor of the www, neither one of them claims ownership AFAIK. Another > story is the net and the US government. ;) The initial forrest code is > coming from Nicola Ken Barozzi and Ross Gardler has started the plugins > both do not claim ownership neither do I with views aka v2 aka > dispatcher, still the initial code came from this people. I think the concern is that we shouldn't name the people responsible.=20 All the above mentioned people are more than welcome to claim their contributions on a private site, the question seems to be whether forrest.a.o should highlight individuals' contributions or be content with highlighting the applications new features (that happened to be developed by a contributor who is appropriately acknowledged in all the above mentioned places). > Doing some research on the forrest history for my presentation I noticed > that we are starting to hide historical facts and motives. You seem to be implying something here but I won't take a guess at what it is. Maybe it's a language thing but questioning "motives" is fairly serious in implying someone has an ulterior one. I hope that's not what you really mean... >I know we > still have all this information but it is well hidden (e.g. [1]). Another stale example. That's actually a good example of why what you suggest at the end of this email is not such a good idea -- it has no real chance of being maintained. > Why? > > I strongly agree with "none of it would be possible without the rest of > us" but one should not confuse one thing from the other. > > Like the very first dispatcher site ever online is from Diwaker Gupta > [2], helping us (especially me, back then) to demonstrate that one can > use the dispatcher in production. It was the very first version > codename: view. Thanks again Diwaker. > > I like history and the humanity would be nothing if not people would > have kept track when and how something happen. Forrest has some of the best history I could think of -- *much* better than any history book I've ever read. It's got SVN logs, SVN blame, mail archives, and changes.html. If we're ever a famous project the historian that writes our book will have it too easy;) > Do not get me wrong but I would like to start a history page about > forrest (here) and keeping track of who did what, because it helps to > understand us currently as project and where we are heading. > > wdyt? I think that's a bad idea because it's destined to become an unread, unmaintained page floating about giving misinformation to the masses.=20 I think svn logs, svn blame, and mail archives gives the history for geeks that care. [1] gives the history for the rest of folks. > BTW why do we versioning old docu? ;) So that folks can always 'svn revert' when I goof up? ;) Because we have users that haven't yet upgraded to the latest version. Having said all this, I personally think that David's change was a bit hasty. We don't sensor anyone else's "live-site" contribution, why would we filter our own fellow committer? If Thorsten wants that to be his tag line for his personal site, what say to do we have in that? It's his personal web site. Since we as the PMC actually endorse all other content on the site, maybe this live-sites page needs a disclaimer at the top saying that the Forrest PMC, commiters, and developers provide these links for examples and information only - we do not endorse any particular product, service, or information linked from this page? --tim [1] - http://forrest.apache.org/docs_0_80/changes.html