Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4427A91B.2000501@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:58:03 +0100
From: Ross Gardler <rgardler@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@forrest.apache.org
Subject: Re: planning the 0.8 release (Was: [RT] structurer location and
 resource
 types)
References: <20060321072901.GB7761@igg.indexgeo.com.au>
 <1142934803.8531.25.camel@localhost> <1142989390.8262.121.camel@localhost>
 <44212FA8.1090009@apache.org> <1143042114.8537.72.camel@localhost>
 <20060324111133.GO5008@igg.indexgeo.com.au>
 <1143205238.8999.95.camel@localhost>
 <002f01c64f4c$6d09deb0$0200a8c0@developer>
 <20060325002826.GQ5008@igg.indexgeo.com.au> <4424BECB.9010904@apache.org>
 <20060327040627.GB25784@igg.indexgeo.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <20060327040627.GB25784@igg.indexgeo.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

David Crossley wrote:
> Ross Gardler wrote:
> 
>>David Crossley wrote:

...

>>
>>http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310000&fixfor=12310040
>>

...

> 
> The "roadmap" mixes in all of the plugins issues.
> The so-called "Priority" is a reporter-based priority.

Does it? I can't check it right now (I'm replying offline) but I'm 
pretty sure I moved all of the plugin stuff out of the roadmap for 0.8. 
The only references to plugins in there (that I intentionally left) is 
to how core handles plugins.

> We also need regularly look at the "unscheduled"
> filter and add some to the roadmap. There have
> been many new issues added since you did that
> initial classification.

I have been watching them carefully and adding those necessary to the 08 
roadmap. I may have missed some, i don't claim that this is finished 
since it has not been reviewed by the community. But the point is most 
of what you say needs to be done has been done. It just needs review. I 
have been progressing along this roadmap assuming lazy consensus was in 
operation.

>>>>What are the improvements to Forrest other than dispatcher
>>>>that warrant there being a 0.8 release ?
>>>
>>>Lets make a dotpoint list here in email.
>>
>>For my take on this see the (yawn) 0.8 roadmap. I'm not about to do it 
>>all again - others can add/remove as they see fit. I'll re-emerge when 
>>the discussion dies down and a vote is called.
> 
> 
> Apart from a simple list of all issues that have
> been fixed, i don't see any dotpoint list in the
> roadmap that we can use to write the release notes.

I think we interpreted the question differently. You interpreted it as 
"what *has* been done" I interpreted it as "what *needs* to be done". If 
we put both our answers together we have it well covered ;-)

Ross