Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 73398 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2006 08:50:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2006 08:50:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 67650 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2006 08:50:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-forrest-dev-archive@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 67475 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2006 08:50:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@forrest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@forrest.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@forrest.apache.org Received: (qmail 67463 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2006 08:50:51 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:50:51 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [212.23.3.142] (HELO rutherford.zen.co.uk) (212.23.3.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:50:50 -0800 Received: from [82.69.78.226] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by rutherford.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1FMi05-0003Y0-3a for dev@forrest.apache.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 08:50:29 +0000 Message-ID: <4423B2D2.9050404@apache.org> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 08:50:26 +0000 From: Ross Gardler User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Forrest Developers List Subject: Re: svn commit: r388006 - /forrest/trunk/site-author/content/xdocs/guidelines.xml References: <20060323024556.75856.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <20060323024556.75856.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-Rutherford-IP: [82.69.78.226] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N crossley@apache.org wrote: > Author: crossley > Date: Wed Mar 22 18:45:54 2006 > New Revision: 388006 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=388006&view=rev > Log: > Various comments on different ASF mailing lists indicate that calling > it "The Apache Way" is not a good idea. This might be worth highlighting for those not reading the other lists. The key point I remember for not calling it "the Apache Way" is because it implies that Apache has some kind of "ownership" over this approach. This is simply not true, all we do is adopt an Open Development Process, with an emphasis on community over code. Many other groups/projects do the same/similar. Ross