forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ross Gardler <>
Subject Re: planning the 0.8 release (Was: [RT] structurer location and resource types)
Date Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:51:23 GMT
David Crossley wrote:
> Ross Gardler wrote:
>>David Crossley wrote:
>>>Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>>David Crossley wrote:
>>>The "roadmap" mixes in all of the plugins issues.
>>>The so-called "Priority" is a reporter-based priority.
>>Does it? I can't check it right now (I'm replying offline) but I'm 
>>pretty sure I moved all of the plugin stuff out of the roadmap for 0.8. 
>>The only references to plugins in there (that I intentionally left) is 
>>to how core handles plugins.
> Ah, i did not realise that you were doing that.
> However, as we move more stuff into plugins,
> what would happen when we have plugins issues
> that need to be fixed?

That's where you urgency field comes in (which wasn't available when I 
did the 0.8 roadmap).

>>>We also need regularly look at the "unscheduled"
>>>filter and add some to the roadmap. There have
>>>been many new issues added since you did that
>>>initial classification.
>>I have been watching them carefully and adding those necessary to the 08 
>>roadmap. I may have missed some, i don't claim that this is finished 
>>since it has not been reviewed by the community. But the point is most 
>>of what you say needs to be done has been done. It just needs review. I 
>>have been progressing along this roadmap assuming lazy consensus was in 
> We agreed that we needed to have the additional
> field called "Urgency" (see earlier in this thread).
> You helped to craft the words to explain it and
> to define the options. See:

Yes, and as new issues have been coming in I have tried to give them an 
urgency rating, although I am sure some have slipped through my net.


View raw message