forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Crossley <cross...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [jira] Updated: (FOR-831) Dispatcher Build, Clean and Deploy Batch File for Windows
Date Sat, 18 Mar 2006 11:15:42 GMT
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> David Crossley escribi??:
> > Gav.... wrote:
> > > David Crossley wrote:
> > > >
> > > >In the meantime, why does the script clean and re-build
> > > >forrest? That should be a separate concern. See the
> > > >old etc/structurer.sh
> > > 
> > > My fault probably, but intentional on my part for builddispatcher.bat.
> > > 
> > > Whenever you need to deploy plugins for dispatcher use, is usually
> > > right after an svn up, then you need to 'build clean' and 'build', then you
> > > have to deploy plugins again, that is why they are all in there together.
> > 
> > No, you do not need to rebuild after every
> > 'svn update'. Only when there have been changes
> > to *.java files.
> 
> Well, since the development of the new plugins I wrote that you need to
> build clean, since, yes, I changed a lot of *.java. ...but it is most of
> the time better to build clean, anyway.
> 
> > > The *nix equiv has been patched as builddispatcher.sh and is not meant
> > > as a replacement for structurer.sh.
> > 
> > Yeah, structurer.sh is old.
> > 
> > I was just pointing to that as an example
> > of not needing to use 'build clean; build'.
> 
> Well on the other heand it does not hurt and takes on my maschine 6 sec
> more.

But it wipes out the other installed plugins,
so if you have a site that uses many plugins
(especially the Gallery plugin) then it takes
many minutes to get back up again.

Never mind. You guys do whatever you want.

Personally i just cd to the dispatcher and themes.core
and do local-deploy.

-David

> > > If you would rather they be removed , no problem, but then you are
> > > needing to run two batch files to get dispatcher working again.
> > > 
> > > Let me know how you would rather have it.
> > 
> > Without the build part.
> > 
> > What do others think?
> 
> -1
> 
> I like the patch like it is and have no seen arguments that convinced me
> that we should split the scripts. Gav is right why should we force
> somebody to use two script if she can use one. 
> 
> The patches are a nice way to get the dispatcher working for sure.
> 
> salu2
> -- 
> thorsten
> 
> "Together we stand, divided we fall!" 
> Hey you (Pink Floyd)
> 

Mime
View raw message